Post-rally investors are left wondering which is the better bet: stocks or bonds.
by Bradley Kay | 2009-10-14 04:00:00
Although ETFs have broadened to encompass a variety of actively managed and selective funds based on quantitative models, they remain a market mostly composed of index funds. As a result, our ETF research team has to keep abreast of trends and valuations across the entire cross-section of capital markets here and abroad. This incredible breadth of potential investments normally provides at least one or two sizable opportunities, or at least a couple clear bubbles to avoid, but our hunts for value have turned up fewer and fewer lately. After the nearly simultaneous surges in equities and collapsing credit spreads worldwide, the easy gains have vanished and hard choices await investors.
The spur for this article was a Monday piece by Tony Jackson of the Financial Times, which was republished here on Morningstar.com. I highly recommend reading that column, as it cleverly articulated the very discussions we on the ETF research team have had in recent weeks as we look at potential medium-term investments and especially focus on the most fundamental asset-allocation choice of all: bonds or stocks?
The banking crisis claimed corporate bonds as a victim far before stocks hit their lows. By November and December of 2008, credit spreads peaked as hedge funds and banks dumped their riskier bonds to meet capital calls. The Barclays Capital US High Yield Intermediate Index had a yield above 22% briefly and the investment-grade index moved above 8% yield, all while Treasury bonds sat around 3.5%. These prices reflected a fear of bankruptcy waves that could match or even exceed Great Depression levels and provided an excellent opportunity for anyone who felt the panic was overdone. From November 2008 through the end of September 2009, an investment in investment-grade dollar bonds would have produced a decidedly unbondlike 27% gain, while intermediate junk bonds have rallied a whopping 43%.
Meanwhile, stocks had a severe double dip that saw them hitting Great Depression-level lows on March 9 nearly everywhere worldwide. The sole exception was emerging markets, which never retested their December lows. Since then, the S&P 500 gained more than 56% through September, versus a 72% rally for the EAFE Index, 84% for U.S. small caps, and a mind-blowing 91% run for emerging markets. The higher risk of these equity investments paid off with higher returns in the rebound, but the returns on U.S. credit bonds are comparably excellent after adjusting for their lower volatility and greater income potential.
This brings us to today, and the choice between whether bonds or stocks have the better outlook. The juicy credit spreads have vanished along with the most compelling stock valuations, and government bonds almost uniformly trade at yields that leave little room for a surge of economic growth or inflation. If we continue to muddle through the recovery like we have the past several months, with little economic growth and even less risk of soaring prices, then corporate bonds and equities both offer modest near-term returns. The true distinction of which investment will perform best depends on the macroeconomic risks that one thinks are most likely.
Should inflation return with a vengeance, obviously the fixed nominal coupons of corporate securities will suffer relative to the rising prices and dividends of equities. However, a sudden economic recovery could also crush today's corporate bonds. If employment started to rise and business investment picked up, real rates would need to rise swiftly to prevent an inflationary spiral. While the seven-year benchmark Treasury bond currently sits at a yield of 3%, it yielded more than 5% during much of the 2001-02 recession and could easily return to those levels if economic activity picks up. Should that happen, yields on corporate bonds would need to rise to match, as current spreads are too narrow to absorb all the rise in real risk-free rates, hurting the investment of anyone who hops into investment-grade debt at today's prices.
On the other hand, today's equity prices do include a slight premium on current depressed earnings. This reflects an expectation that revenues will begin to pick up as modest growth returns, swelling the bottom lines of all the companies whose aggressive cost-cutting efforts kept them barely in the black through the first and second quarters. If the recovery fails to catch hold, and we slip into a no-growth state or even deflation, those revenues will fail to materialize and the stock market may suffer a correction. In that case, the modest nominal returns of corporate bonds look pretty good, especially since the revival of investment-grade debt markets has substantially reduced the risk of defaults due to liquidity crunches.
The outlook is still quite hazy. We do not know which of these scenarios is most likely in the next year or two, so we have been focusing more on the superior long-term returns of equities. Developed markets overseas offer slightly better valuations than the U.S. or emerging markets, along with some protection from a falling dollar for those who fear the U.S. debt overhang. But that, I'm afraid, is another column entirely.
Disclosure: Morningstar licenses its indexes to certain ETF and ETN providers, including Barclays Global Investors (BGI), Claymore Securities, First Trust, and ELEMENTS, for use in exchange-traded funds and notes. These ETFs and ETNs are not sponsored, issued, or sold by Morningstar. Morningstar does not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in ETFs or ETNs that are based on Morningstar indexes.
Before investing in an ETF, be sure to carefully consider the fund's objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. For a prospectus containing this and other important information, please click the prospectus link. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Leveraged and inverse ETFs entail unique risks, including but not limited to: use of leverage; aggressive and complex investment techniques; and use of derivatives. Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver multiples of the performance of a benchmark. Inverse ETFs seek to deliver the opposite of the performance of a benchmark. Both seek results over periods as short as a single day. Results of both strategies can be affected substantially by compounding. Returns over longer periods will likely differ in amount and even direction. These products require active monitoring and management, as frequently as daily. They are not suitable for all investors.
ETFs are subject to risk similar to those of their underlying securities, including, but not limited to, market, sector, or industry risks, and those regarding short-selling and margin account maintenance.
TDX Independence Funds, Inc. ETFs are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. Amerivest Investment Management LLC serves as a sub-advisor to the Funds. TD AMERITRADE is not affiliated with TDX Independence Funds, Inc. or ALPS Distributors, Inc. Amerivest Investment Management LLC is a subsidiary of TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation.
Research and planning tools are obtained by unaffiliated third party sources deemed reliable by TD AMERITRADE. However, TD AMERITRADE does not guarantee accuracy and completeness, and makes no warranties with respect to results to be obtained from their use. ETFs are baskets of securities that track recognized indexes and trade on an exchange like a stock. Commission fees apply.
Morningstar Associates, LLC is a registered investment advisor and wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc. The information, data and opinions contained herein include proprietary information of Morningstar Associates and may not be copied or redistributed for any purpose. The mutual funds selected by Morningstar Associates for the Premier List have been derived from a universe of mutual funds made available through TD AMERITRADE. Both the universe of mutual funds defined by TD AMERITRADE and the Premier List are subject to change without notice. Morningstar Associates does not warrant this information to be accurate, complete or timely. Morningstar Associates is not responsible for any damages or losses arising from the use of this information. Particular mutual funds on the Premier List may not be appropriate investments for you under your circumstances, and there may be other mutual funds or investment options offered by TD AMERITRADE that are more suitable. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Hard Choices Ahead for Asset Allocators
Post-rally investors are left wondering which is the better bet: stocks or bonds.
The spur for this article was a Monday piece by Tony Jackson of the Financial Times, which was republished here on Morningstar.com. I highly recommend reading that column, as it cleverly articulated the very discussions we on the ETF research team have had in recent weeks as we look at potential medium-term investments and especially focus on the most fundamental asset-allocation choice of all: bonds or stocks?
The banking crisis claimed corporate bonds as a victim far before stocks hit their lows. By November and December of 2008, credit spreads peaked as hedge funds and banks dumped their riskier bonds to meet capital calls. The Barclays Capital US High Yield Intermediate Index had a yield above 22% briefly and the investment-grade index moved above 8% yield, all while Treasury bonds sat around 3.5%. These prices reflected a fear of bankruptcy waves that could match or even exceed Great Depression levels and provided an excellent opportunity for anyone who felt the panic was overdone. From November 2008 through the end of September 2009, an investment in investment-grade dollar bonds would have produced a decidedly unbondlike 27% gain, while intermediate junk bonds have rallied a whopping 43%.
Meanwhile, stocks had a severe double dip that saw them hitting Great Depression-level lows on March 9 nearly everywhere worldwide. The sole exception was emerging markets, which never retested their December lows. Since then, the S&P 500 gained more than 56% through September, versus a 72% rally for the EAFE Index, 84% for U.S. small caps, and a mind-blowing 91% run for emerging markets. The higher risk of these equity investments paid off with higher returns in the rebound, but the returns on U.S. credit bonds are comparably excellent after adjusting for their lower volatility and greater income potential.
This brings us to today, and the choice between whether bonds or stocks have the better outlook. The juicy credit spreads have vanished along with the most compelling stock valuations, and government bonds almost uniformly trade at yields that leave little room for a surge of economic growth or inflation. If we continue to muddle through the recovery like we have the past several months, with little economic growth and even less risk of soaring prices, then corporate bonds and equities both offer modest near-term returns. The true distinction of which investment will perform best depends on the macroeconomic risks that one thinks are most likely.
Should inflation return with a vengeance, obviously the fixed nominal coupons of corporate securities will suffer relative to the rising prices and dividends of equities. However, a sudden economic recovery could also crush today's corporate bonds. If employment started to rise and business investment picked up, real rates would need to rise swiftly to prevent an inflationary spiral. While the seven-year benchmark Treasury bond currently sits at a yield of 3%, it yielded more than 5% during much of the 2001-02 recession and could easily return to those levels if economic activity picks up. Should that happen, yields on corporate bonds would need to rise to match, as current spreads are too narrow to absorb all the rise in real risk-free rates, hurting the investment of anyone who hops into investment-grade debt at today's prices.
On the other hand, today's equity prices do include a slight premium on current depressed earnings. This reflects an expectation that revenues will begin to pick up as modest growth returns, swelling the bottom lines of all the companies whose aggressive cost-cutting efforts kept them barely in the black through the first and second quarters. If the recovery fails to catch hold, and we slip into a no-growth state or even deflation, those revenues will fail to materialize and the stock market may suffer a correction. In that case, the modest nominal returns of corporate bonds look pretty good, especially since the revival of investment-grade debt markets has substantially reduced the risk of defaults due to liquidity crunches.
The outlook is still quite hazy. We do not know which of these scenarios is most likely in the next year or two, so we have been focusing more on the superior long-term returns of equities. Developed markets overseas offer slightly better valuations than the U.S. or emerging markets, along with some protection from a falling dollar for those who fear the U.S. debt overhang. But that, I'm afraid, is another column entirely.
Disclosure: Morningstar licenses its indexes to certain ETF and ETN providers, including Barclays Global Investors (BGI), Claymore Securities, First Trust, and ELEMENTS, for use in exchange-traded funds and notes. These ETFs and ETNs are not sponsored, issued, or sold by Morningstar. Morningstar does not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in ETFs or ETNs that are based on Morningstar indexes.