Record flows, launches, and closures were among the major milestones.
by Ben Johnson, CFA | 2021-01-05 05:00:00
Global stock markets put an exclamation point at the end of a remarkable year in December. The Morningstar Global Markets Index--a broad gauge of global equities--gained 4.86% during the month and ended the year 16.07% higher than where it began. After favoring bond exchange-traded funds for most of the year, investors jumped on the equity ETF bandwagon in the final two months of 2020. While the $44.8 billion that investors allocated to stock ETFs in December was sharply lower than November’s record $81.8 billion, it marked the sixth-largest monthly inflow ever into this group. When the books closed on 2020, ETFs had taken in a record $499 billion in net flows and held just under $5.5 trillion of investors’ money.
Here, I will take a closer look at how the major asset classes performed in 2020, where investors were putting their money, and which segments of the market looked cheap and dear at year’s end--all through the lens of ETFs.
Stocks Finish the Year Looking Fairly Valued
Exhibit 1 features December performance figures for a sampling of Morningstar Medalist ETFs representing most major asset classes. Investors in a blended global market portfolio gained 3.07% during the month. Stock markets were higher across the board. U.S. stocks, as proxied by iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF finished the month trading 8% above their fair value, as measured by the fund's Morningstar price/fair value estimate. Small caps had another strong showing in December. IShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF gained 8.24% and ended the year trading at a 3% premium to its Morningstar fair value estimate after spending most of the year at a considerable discount. Meanwhile, iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF were trading at respective premiums of 8% and 11%.
While U.S. small caps turned a corner in November, they still lagged mid- and large caps by a wide margin for the year. IJR trailed IVV by more than 7 percentage points in 2020. Missing out on the gains of the market’s Fab Five (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Facebook, and Alphabet) and sticking with REITs and regional banks that were hit hard by the coronavirus crisis explains most of IJR’s 2020 underperformance.
Despite posting double-digit gains during the last two months of the year, value stocks still finished 2020 in the hole. The Morningstar U.S. Value Index rose 18.65% from Nov. 1 through year-end but lost 2.33% for the full year. Meanwhile, the Morningstar U.S. Growth Index gained 44.44% in 2020. ETFs in the large-, mid-, and small-value Morningstar Categories found buyers once again in December. Just over $11 billion flowed into these funds last month. After experiencing net outflows through the first 10 months of 2020, these ETFs gathered nearly $17 billion in net new assets in the last two months of the year.
The spread of valuations among strategic-beta ETFs representing a variety of individual factors speaks to the themes that defined stock markets in 2020. At year-end, after falling 0.32% over the preceding 12 months, iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF was trading at an 9% discount to its Morningstar fair value estimate. It finished October trading 21% below its fair value. On the other hand, iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF gained 29.69% in 2020 and closed the year at a 32% premium to its fair value estimate.
A Record Year for ETF Records
It was a year of ETF records. New records were set for total flows; flows into bond ETFs; flows into environmental, social, and governance ETFs; and flows into active ETFs. There was a record number of new ETFs launched, and a record number of ETFs closed.
While the $231.8 billion in flows fell shy of a new record for equity ETFs in 2020, they outstripped the record $212.1 billion that investors poured into bond ETFs. Over the course of the year, most flows went to portfolio staples like Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF. But many investors weren’t willing to suffice for market-matching returns. The Ark family of ETFs shot the lights out in 2020. All five of the firm’s mainline funds produced triple-digit returns. Investors took notice. The firm pulled in $20.5 billion in net flows in 2020, representing 646% organic growth. As 2020 came to a close, the firm ranked as the 11th-largest ETF provider.
Vanguard was back on top of the ETF flows league table in December. The firm’s ETFs raked in $25.5 billion, putting it well ahead of the competition for the full year. Some of Vanguard's recent ETF flows have resulted from conversions of assets in the firm's Admiral share class to ETF shares, which are now cheaper than the Admiral shares of the same funds after a wave of recent repricing. The firm has since either directly converted some of its investors’ existing Admiral share class allocations to the ETF share class or otherwise nudged investors to do it on their own.
ProShares had record inflows in 2020. The leveraged and inverse ETF specialist brought in $11.1 billion in net new money as investors used these specialized funds to try to capitalize on whipsawing markets. First Trust also had a record haul in 2020. The firm’s ETFs amassed $12.9 billion in net inflows, aided by nearly $3.4 billion of inflows into the First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF.
Following a three-month streak of outflows spanning from April to June, Schwab's ETF lineup experienced its sixth consecutive month of inflows in December. Its three-month drought earlier in the year broke the firm's long record of steady net inflows, which had gone uninterrupted from its 2009 inception through April 2020. Outflows were likely driven by changes to the firm's proprietary ETF model portfolios. The firm’s $15.8 billion 2020 flow tally was its lowest since 2015, when its ETFs brought in $14.2 billion.
WisdomTree was alone among the 10 largest ETF issuers in experiencing outflows in 2020. The firm’s currency-hedged duo of WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF--which were once its largest offerings--saw a combined $1.98 billion of outflows for the year. The two funds’ combined assets peaked near $40 billion in 2015. At the end of 2020, the pair held a total of $3.5 billion.
Old Economy Stocks Look Cheap, New Economy Stocks Appear Dear
The fair value estimate for ETFs rolls up our equity analysts' fair value estimates for individual stocks and our quantitative fair value estimates for stocks not covered by Morningstar analysts into an aggregate fair value estimate for stock ETF portfolios. Dividing this value by the ETFs' market prices yields the price/fair value ratio. This ratio can point to potential bargains and areas of the market where valuations are stretched.
Exhibit 6 features the 10 ETFs that were trading at the largest discounts and premiums to their fair value estimates as of the end of December. Eight of the 10 funds trading at the largest discounts belong to the equity energy category. Pain was pervasive in the energy sector in 2020 as demand declined and supply continued to flood the market. As producers ran out of places to store their output, prices collapsed, as did the share prices of firms operating in the oil- and gas-services industry.
But the market is a discounting mechanism, and in the last two months of the year, it was hopeful that a return to some semblance of normalcy was in sight as the first doses of coronavirus vaccines were administered. The prospect of reopening the global economy gave a lift to oil prices and energy ETFs. But even after getting a proverbial shot in the arm, valuations in the sector remain depressed and these funds continue to feature prominently in the ETF bargain bin.
Notable among this month’s list of ETFs trading at the largest premiums to their fair value estimates are VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF. Both ranked among 2020’s top performers. SMOG spiked 118.63% for the year, while shares of ICLN were up 141.31%. Their gains accelerated toward year-end, reflecting investors’ enthusiasm for clean energy names, which increased following the U.S. presidential election and the prospect that the incoming Biden administration will advocate for some form of “Green New Deal.â€
Exhibit 7 features the 10 broad-based ETFs (those belonging to one of the mainline Morningstar Style Box or other broader geographic categories) that were trading at the largest discounts and premiums to their fair value estimates as of month-end. The common thread among all these funds is an orientation toward smaller, cheaper stocks. Some of them deliberately lean into value by virtue of selecting and weighting stocks based on their relative cheapness. This is the case for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF. Eight value-leaning funds that invest in international stocks also make this month's list. Notable among them is iShares Edge MSCI International Value Factor ETF, the foreign cousin of VLUE. Like its U.S. counterpart, IVLU takes a sector-neutral approach, sweeping in the cheapest stocks within each sector and weighting them based on a combination of their market cap and the strength of their value characteristics. The result is a portfolio with a strong and consistent value orientation.
Four of the 10 most overvalued broad-based ETFs ply momentum strategies--sweeping in the markets’ best recent performers. At the end of a year where momentum stocks reaped big gains, it isn’t surprising to see these four make the list. Equally unsurprising is the presence of some thematic ETFs that also got swept up in the momentum trade in 2020. Notable among them is Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF, which includes some of last year’s highfliers like Shopify and Amazon among its top holdings.
Disclosure: Morningstar, Inc. licenses indexes to financial institutions as the tracking indexes for investable products, such as exchange-traded funds, sponsored by the financial institution. The license fee for such use is paid by the sponsoring financial institution based mainly on the total assets of the investable product. Please click here for a list of investable products that track or have tracked a Morningstar index. Neither Morningstar, Inc. nor its investment management division markets, sells, or makes any representations regarding the advisability of investing in any investable product that tracks a Morningstar index.
Carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing. A prospectus, obtained by calling 800-669-3900, contains this and other important information about an investment company. Read carefully before investing.
A mutual fund is not FDIC-insured, may lose value, and is not guaranteed by a bank or other financial institution.
Performance quoted represents past performance, is no guarantee of future results, and may not provide an adequate basis for evaluating the performance of the product over varying market conditions or economic cycles. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
TD Ameritrade receives remuneration from mutual fund companies, including those participating in its no-load, no-transaction-fee program, for recordkeeping, shareholder services, and other administrative and distribution services. The amount of TD Ameritrade's remuneration for these services is based in part on the amount of investments in such funds by TD Ameritrade clients. PLEASE ALSO SEE IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL FUND FEE DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
No-transaction-fee funds and other funds offered through TD Ameritrade have other fees and expenses that apply to a continued investment in the fund and are described in the prospectus.
Mutual funds, closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds are subject to market, exchange rate, political, credit, interest rate, and prepayment risks, which vary depending on the type of fund. International investments involve special risks, including currency fluctuations and political and economic instability. Asset allocation and diversification do not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Fund purchases may be subject to investment minimums, eligibility and other restrictions, as well as charges and expenses.
1You could lose money by investing in a money market fund.Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1 per share, it cannot guarantee it will do so.The fund may impose a fee upon the sale of your shares or may temporarily suspend your ability to sell shares if the fund's liquidity falls below required minimums because of market conditions or other factors. An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. The fund's sponsor has no legal obligation to provide financial support to the fund, and you should not expect that the sponsor will provide financial support to the fund at any time.
2You could lose money by investing in a money market fund. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1 per share, it cannot guarantee it will do so. An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. The fund’s sponsor has no legal obligation to provide financial support to the fund, and you should not expect that the sponsor will provide financial support to the fund at any time.
3You could lose money by investing in a money market fund. Because the share price of the fund will fluctuate, when you sell your shares they may be worth more or less than what you originally paid for them. The fund may impose a fee upon the sale of your shares or may temporarily suspend your ability to sell shares if the fund's liquidity falls below required minimums because of market conditions or other factors. An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency. The fund's sponsor has no legal obligation to provide financial support to the fund, and you should not expect that the sponsor will provide financial support to the fund at any time.
Some mutual funds sold through TD Ameritrade impose a charge on the purchase of shares, called a “sales load.” An investor may be able to purchase fund shares through TD Ameritrade without paying a front-end sales load, but an investor may be charged a fee, called a “contingent deferred sales charge,” when the investor sells or redeems shares. TD Ameritrade may receive part or all of the sales load.
Some mutual funds offer reductions in front-end sales loads (“breakpoints”) for purchases over certain amounts or purchases through Letters of Intent or Rights of Accumulation. Some funds also offer waivers of those loads, often to retirement plans or charities. Such breakpoints or waivers will be as further described in the prospectus. You, as the investor, should determine and obtain any breakpoints or waivers or provide TD Ameritrade with sufficient information to assist it in obtaining them.
Most mutual funds charge 2.00% on the redemption of shares (including by exchange) held for less than a certain number of calendar days. Performance figures reported do not reflect the deduction of this fee. If reflected, the fee would reduce the performance quoted. Please refer to the fund's prospectus for redemption fee information. TD Ameritrade may also charge its own short-term redemption fee.
TD AMERITRADE RISKS OF INVESTING IN FUNDS: PLEASE READ IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL MUTUAL FUND, EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND, AND CLOSED-END FUND RISK DISCLOSURES
Research and planning tools are obtained by unaffiliated third-party sources deemed reliable by TD Ameritrade. However, TD Ameritrade does not guarantee their accuracy and completeness and makes no warranties with respect to results to be obtained from their use. The Investment Profile report is for informational purposes only.
Mutual Funds: Commentary
Commentary
2020 Was a Record Year for ETF Records
Record flows, launches, and closures were among the major milestones.
Here, I will take a closer look at how the major asset classes performed in 2020, where investors were putting their money, and which segments of the market looked cheap and dear at year’s end--all through the lens of ETFs.
Stocks Finish the Year Looking Fairly Valued
Exhibit 1 features December performance figures for a sampling of Morningstar Medalist ETFs representing most major asset classes. Investors in a blended global market portfolio gained 3.07% during the month. Stock markets were higher across the board. U.S. stocks, as proxied by iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF finished the month trading 8% above their fair value, as measured by the fund's Morningstar price/fair value estimate. Small caps had another strong showing in December. IShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF gained 8.24% and ended the year trading at a 3% premium to its Morningstar fair value estimate after spending most of the year at a considerable discount. Meanwhile, iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF were trading at respective premiums of 8% and 11%.
While U.S. small caps turned a corner in November, they still lagged mid- and large caps by a wide margin for the year. IJR trailed IVV by more than 7 percentage points in 2020. Missing out on the gains of the market’s Fab Five (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon.com, Facebook, and Alphabet) and sticking with REITs and regional banks that were hit hard by the coronavirus crisis explains most of IJR’s 2020 underperformance.
Despite posting double-digit gains during the last two months of the year, value stocks still finished 2020 in the hole. The Morningstar U.S. Value Index rose 18.65% from Nov. 1 through year-end but lost 2.33% for the full year. Meanwhile, the Morningstar U.S. Growth Index gained 44.44% in 2020. ETFs in the large-, mid-, and small-value Morningstar Categories found buyers once again in December. Just over $11 billion flowed into these funds last month. After experiencing net outflows through the first 10 months of 2020, these ETFs gathered nearly $17 billion in net new assets in the last two months of the year.
The spread of valuations among strategic-beta ETFs representing a variety of individual factors speaks to the themes that defined stock markets in 2020. At year-end, after falling 0.32% over the preceding 12 months, iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF was trading at an 9% discount to its Morningstar fair value estimate. It finished October trading 21% below its fair value. On the other hand, iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF gained 29.69% in 2020 and closed the year at a 32% premium to its fair value estimate.
A Record Year for ETF Records
It was a year of ETF records. New records were set for total flows; flows into bond ETFs; flows into environmental, social, and governance ETFs; and flows into active ETFs. There was a record number of new ETFs launched, and a record number of ETFs closed.
While the $231.8 billion in flows fell shy of a new record for equity ETFs in 2020, they outstripped the record $212.1 billion that investors poured into bond ETFs. Over the course of the year, most flows went to portfolio staples like Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF. But many investors weren’t willing to suffice for market-matching returns. The Ark family of ETFs shot the lights out in 2020. All five of the firm’s mainline funds produced triple-digit returns. Investors took notice. The firm pulled in $20.5 billion in net flows in 2020, representing 646% organic growth. As 2020 came to a close, the firm ranked as the 11th-largest ETF provider.
Vanguard was back on top of the ETF flows league table in December. The firm’s ETFs raked in $25.5 billion, putting it well ahead of the competition for the full year. Some of Vanguard's recent ETF flows have resulted from conversions of assets in the firm's Admiral share class to ETF shares, which are now cheaper than the Admiral shares of the same funds after a wave of recent repricing. The firm has since either directly converted some of its investors’ existing Admiral share class allocations to the ETF share class or otherwise nudged investors to do it on their own.
ProShares had record inflows in 2020. The leveraged and inverse ETF specialist brought in $11.1 billion in net new money as investors used these specialized funds to try to capitalize on whipsawing markets. First Trust also had a record haul in 2020. The firm’s ETFs amassed $12.9 billion in net inflows, aided by nearly $3.4 billion of inflows into the First Trust TCW Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF.
Following a three-month streak of outflows spanning from April to June, Schwab's ETF lineup experienced its sixth consecutive month of inflows in December. Its three-month drought earlier in the year broke the firm's long record of steady net inflows, which had gone uninterrupted from its 2009 inception through April 2020. Outflows were likely driven by changes to the firm's proprietary ETF model portfolios. The firm’s $15.8 billion 2020 flow tally was its lowest since 2015, when its ETFs brought in $14.2 billion.
WisdomTree was alone among the 10 largest ETF issuers in experiencing outflows in 2020. The firm’s currency-hedged duo of WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF--which were once its largest offerings--saw a combined $1.98 billion of outflows for the year. The two funds’ combined assets peaked near $40 billion in 2015. At the end of 2020, the pair held a total of $3.5 billion.
Old Economy Stocks Look Cheap, New Economy Stocks Appear Dear
The fair value estimate for ETFs rolls up our equity analysts' fair value estimates for individual stocks and our quantitative fair value estimates for stocks not covered by Morningstar analysts into an aggregate fair value estimate for stock ETF portfolios. Dividing this value by the ETFs' market prices yields the price/fair value ratio. This ratio can point to potential bargains and areas of the market where valuations are stretched.
Exhibit 6 features the 10 ETFs that were trading at the largest discounts and premiums to their fair value estimates as of the end of December. Eight of the 10 funds trading at the largest discounts belong to the equity energy category. Pain was pervasive in the energy sector in 2020 as demand declined and supply continued to flood the market. As producers ran out of places to store their output, prices collapsed, as did the share prices of firms operating in the oil- and gas-services industry.
But the market is a discounting mechanism, and in the last two months of the year, it was hopeful that a return to some semblance of normalcy was in sight as the first doses of coronavirus vaccines were administered. The prospect of reopening the global economy gave a lift to oil prices and energy ETFs. But even after getting a proverbial shot in the arm, valuations in the sector remain depressed and these funds continue to feature prominently in the ETF bargain bin.
Notable among this month’s list of ETFs trading at the largest premiums to their fair value estimates are VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF. Both ranked among 2020’s top performers. SMOG spiked 118.63% for the year, while shares of ICLN were up 141.31%. Their gains accelerated toward year-end, reflecting investors’ enthusiasm for clean energy names, which increased following the U.S. presidential election and the prospect that the incoming Biden administration will advocate for some form of “Green New Deal.â€
Exhibit 7 features the 10 broad-based ETFs (those belonging to one of the mainline Morningstar Style Box or other broader geographic categories) that were trading at the largest discounts and premiums to their fair value estimates as of month-end. The common thread among all these funds is an orientation toward smaller, cheaper stocks. Some of them deliberately lean into value by virtue of selecting and weighting stocks based on their relative cheapness. This is the case for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF. Eight value-leaning funds that invest in international stocks also make this month's list. Notable among them is iShares Edge MSCI International Value Factor ETF, the foreign cousin of VLUE. Like its U.S. counterpart, IVLU takes a sector-neutral approach, sweeping in the cheapest stocks within each sector and weighting them based on a combination of their market cap and the strength of their value characteristics. The result is a portfolio with a strong and consistent value orientation.
Four of the 10 most overvalued broad-based ETFs ply momentum strategies--sweeping in the markets’ best recent performers. At the end of a year where momentum stocks reaped big gains, it isn’t surprising to see these four make the list. Equally unsurprising is the presence of some thematic ETFs that also got swept up in the momentum trade in 2020. Notable among them is Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF, which includes some of last year’s highfliers like Shopify and Amazon among its top holdings.
Don’t Count Out World Allocation Strategies Just Yet
Funds for 2021 and Beyond
4 Investment Strategies Now on Our Radar
5 Tips for Trading ETFs
International Equities Finish 2020 Higher Despite Wild Ride
Fund Managers: No Travel? No Problem! Well, Maybe a Few
2020 Year-End Wrap-Up: U.S. Equity Funds
Blacklisted Chinese Stocks Not a Burning Issue for U.S.-Based Stock Funds, Yet
A Strong Choice Among Small-Growth Funds
2020 Was a Record Year for ETF Records
3rd Party Research Disclosure /public-4:15:0
Market Data Disclosure