CIT Group Inc
Change company Symbol lookup
Select an option...
CIT CIT Group Inc
NXPI NXP Semiconductors NV
PRTK Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
VTR Ventas Inc
GBIM Globeimmune Inc
SCKT Socket Mobile Inc
BK Bank of New York Mellon Corp
BAC Bank of America Corp
AACG ATA Creativity Global
MDXL Medixall Group Inc
Go

Financials : Banks | Small Cap Value
Company profile

CIT Group Inc. (CIT) is a bank holding company (BHC) and a financial holding company (FHC). The Company, together with its subsidiaries, provides financing, leasing and advisory services to middle market companies in a range of industries in North America. The Company's segments include Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking, Non-Strategic Portfolios, and Corporate and Other. The Commercial Banking segment consists of four divisions: Commercial Finance, Rail, Real Estate Finance, and Business Capital. The Consumer Banking segment includes Retail Banking, Mortgage Lending, and SBA Lending (together referred to as Other Consumer Banking), and Legacy Consumer Mortgages (LCM). The Company's products and services include account receivables collection, acquisition and expansion financing, asset management and servicing, asset-based loans, debt underwriting and syndication, deposits, enterprise value and cash flow loans, equipment leases, factoring services and financial risk management.

Price
Delayed
$26.62
Day's Change
1.62 (6.48%)
Bid
--
Ask
--
B/A Size
--
Day's High
26.79
Day's Low
24.98
Volume
(Heavy Day)

Today's volume of 4,227,033 shares is on pace to be much greater than CIT's 10-day average volume of 3,692,436 shares.

4,227,033

UPDATE: The M&A surge: Is it rational exuberance or a frenzy before the market falls?

7:43 am ET September 16, 2020 (MarketWatch)
Print

By Lina Saigol

The second Monday of September set deal makers' pulses racing with a flurry of deals announced. The rise in equity markets and low funding costs encouraged chief executives with strong balance sheets to spend their cash on buying growth.

In one day alone, companies across a range of sectors and geographies announced deals worth more than $89.5 billion, according to financial data provider Refinitiv.

Nvidia (NVDA), which makes the microchips used for games, said it was buying U.K.-based chip designer Arm from SoftBank (9984.TO) for $40 billion (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nvidia-and-softbank-are-each-winners-in-40-billion-deal-for-arm-holdings-2020-09-13); U.S. drugmaker Gilead Sciences (GILD) paid $21 billion (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gilead-reaches-21-billion-deal-for-immunomedics-2020-09-13) to acquire biotech Immunomedics (IMMU) and Verizon Communications (VZ) snapped up Tracfone (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/verizon-to-buy-tracfone-in-a-cash-stock-deal-that-could-be-worth-up-to-69-billion-2020-09-14), a unit of Mexican telecom América Móvil (AMX.MX), for $6.25 billion.

That made it the highest Monday total since June 10, 2019 -- and has provided a welcome boost to M&A levels, which sank (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pandemic-fears-grip-ma-as-deal-making-slumps-to-23-year-low-in-europe-2020-06-30) at the height of the coronavirus pandemic as companies preserved their cash.

Now, global mergers and acquisitions volumes have reached $1.97 trillion, down 28% compared with the same period in 2019. Technology deals are soaring, rising 18.6% in value from a year ago to mark the highest level since 2000, Refinitiv data shows.

Read:Surge in megadeals points to M&A recovery as tech sector dominates (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/surge-in-megadeals-points-to-ma-recovery-as-tech-sector-dominates-2020-09-01)

The shopping spree may not yet be over. Buyout groups, which are hoarding $1.5 trillion in unspent capital, according to data provider Preqin, should send deal making activity even higher. "With vast sums of private equity to be deployed, there may be many deals and takeovers as we head into the autumn," said Neil Wilson, chief market analyst for Markets.com.

The immediate winners of the M&A frenzy are the shareholders of the acquired companies. But beyond the rush of excitement lies the question of whether chief executives have now entered into a cycle of excess and are launching bids at the top of the market.

According to Goldman Sachs, there have been three moments of significant M&A downturns (https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/pages/from_briefings_16-june-2020.html) in the last 30 years -- in 1990-1991; 2001-2002; and 2008-2009. "During each of those periods, M&A volumes declined by about 50% over a two-year period followed by another three to six years before volumes recovered to their prior peaks," the U.S. bank said in its Global M&A outlook in June.

Michael Carr, global co-heads of M&A at Goldman Sachs, said that while every cycle is unique, recoveries after severe downturns tend to follow three types of "waves," with the first characterized by involuntary M&A deals, such as bankruptcy sales or forced asset sales to generate liquidity.

"We believe we've entered the second wave of M&A, known as "near-in M&A," where management teams are looking close to home for potential combinations or joint ventures as a way to reduce transaction risks," Carr added.

A look back in history shows that AOL's $164 billion takeover (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/after-decade-of-decline-aol-is-back-as-also-ran-2009-12-07) of Time Warner marked the apex of the late 1990s equity boom, while Royal Bank of Scotland's EUR71 billion takeover (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/consortium-to-pay-101-billion-for-abn-amro-wsj) of ABN Amro and Rio Tinto's $38 billion (http://www.marketwatch.com/story/rio-tinto-agrees-to-acquire-alcan-for-381-billion-in-cash)acquisition of Alcan were struck at the height of the 2007 debt boom.

Neither of those deals was a success and all symbolized executive hubris. Shortly after they were announced, stock markets peaked and M&A activity dropped sharply. They also wiped out so much shareholder value that they ultimately cost the CEOs of the bidding companies their jobs and triggered huge write downs when it became clear that the promised synergies (https://www.barrons.com/articles/synergy-mergers-acquisitions-51546980031) were unattainable.

Professor Scott Moeller, director of the M&A research center at The Business School (formerly Cass), said that, in terms of returns to shareholders, there is clear evidence that the best time for deals is early in the cycle.

"Even though we've seen a huge surge in deals in recent weeks, we could be at the beginning of the wave that marks the peak," Moeller said. "The end of the wave tends to produce financially-driven deals and we are still seeing strategic deals which is encouraging," he added.

There is one certainty for investors: the longer the cycle, the deeper the trough. And that is when M&A becomes no different to any other time.

-Lina Saigol; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

September 16, 2020 07:43 ET (11:43 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Earnings Calendar and Events Data provided by |Terms of Use| © 2020 Wall Street Horizon, Inc.

Market data accompanied by is delayed by at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE MKT, NYSE, and options. Duration of the delay for other exchanges varies.
Market data and information provided by Morningstar.

Options are not suitable for all investors as the special risks inherent to options trading may expose investors to potentially rapid and substantial losses.
Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standard Options before investing in options.

Information and news provided by ,, , Computrade Systems, Inc., , and

Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved.