Ring Energy Inc
Change company Symbol lookup
Select an option...
REI Ring Energy Inc
PXD Pioneer Natural Resources Co
REX REX American Resources Corp
JKS JinkoSolar Holding Co Ltd
RILY B. Riley Financial Inc
DSSI Diamond S Shipping Inc
CVS CVS Health Corp
GM General Motors Co
SKX Skechers USA Inc
KBNT Kubient Inc

Energy : Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Small Cap Value
Company profile

Ring Energy, Inc. (Ring) is an exploration and production company that is engaged in oil and natural gas acquisition, exploration, development and production activities. The Company's exploration and production interests are focused on Texas and Kansas. Its operations are all oil and gas exploration and production related activities in the United States. The Company's primary drilling operations target the Central Basin Platform in Andrews County and Gaines County, Texas, and the Delaware Basin in Reeves County and Culberson County, Texas. As of December 31, 2016, Ring had 53,582 gross (32,663 net) acres in Andrews and Gaines counties and 20,794 gross (20,490 net) acres in Reeves and Culberson counties. The Company also had 14,647 gross (14,549 net) acres in Kansas, as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, Ring's proved reserves were approximately 27.7 million barrel of oil equivalent (BOE).

Day's Change
0.035 (1.56%)
B/A Size
Day's High
Day's Low
(Heavy Day)

Today's volume of 3,090,338 shares is on pace to be much greater than REI's 10-day average volume of 1,754,690 shares.


Apple v. Epic: What to expect from a trial -2-

10:58 am ET May 1, 2021 (MarketWatch)

"More than half of internet traffic comes through mobile phones, whose users rely on mobile applications to access online content and services -- and the vast majority of mobile apps are downloaded from either Apple's App Store or Google's Play Store," the senators wrote. "Apple's power over the cost, distribution, and availability of mobile applications on the Apple devices used by millions of consumers raises serious competition issues that are of interest to the Subcommittee, consumers, and app developers. A full and fair examination of these issues before the Subcommittee requires Apple's participation."

During the Senate hearing, lawyers from Spotify, Match and Tile claimed that steps taken by Apple had undercut their competitive status while at the same time charging them millions of dollars in App Store fees annually.

"Apple abuses its dominant position to insulate itself from competition," Horacio Gutierrez, head of global affairs and chief legal officer of Spotify, testified. "We have been successful despite Apple's anticompetitive behavior."

As Apple and Epic lawyers furiously filed documents in the days leading to the trial, regulators in Europe were reportedly about to charge Apple with anticompetitive behavior for the first time (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-to-face-landmark-antitrust-charges-over-spotify-complaint-this-week-according-to-reports-11619536368?mod=mw_latestnews). The charges stem from Spotify's SPOT (#phrase-company?ref=COMPANY%7CSPOT;onlineSignificance=passing-mention) complaint in March 2019 that Apple abused its control over which apps appear in the App Store to restrict competition against its Apple Music service. A crucial element of Spotify's allegation is that Apple's 30% fee made it difficult for Apple Music rivals to market themselves.

The historical impact of Apple-Epic trial

In the pantheon of technology-industry legal cases, only a few are as significant as Apple v. Epic.

Perhaps the most consequential was just resolved. In April, Google prevailed in the Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, in its decade-long tussle with Oracle Corp. (ORCL) over software development.

For more:Oracle takes strike three in Google legal battle, but the game will likely continue for software developers (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/oracle-takes-strike-three-in-google-legal-battle-but-the-game-will-likely-continue-for-software-developers-11617674585)

Nearly two decades ago, a chancery judge in Wilmington, Del., ruled in favor of then--Hewlett-Packard Co.'s $25 billion merger with Compaq Computer Corp. in 2002. The company subsequently was split into HP Inc. (HPQ) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. (HPE).

Yet the closest parallel to the Apple-Epic case is Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) face-off with the Justice Department in the 1990s over how the software giant tied its fledgling internet browser to its dominant Windows operating system. Netscape Communications, a far smaller company whose browser had been the industry leader, took a position similar to Epic's, and the resulting case led to restraints on Microsoft's outsize ambitions that opened up adjacent markets for the likes of Google and Facebook Inc. (FB).

More on the Microsoft case and its effects:Big Tech was built by the same type of antitrust actions that could now tear it down (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/big-tech-was-built-by-the-same-type-of-antitrust-actions-that-could-now-tear-it-down-2019-06-12)

Where Apple v. Epic lands on the historical timeline depends on the outcome, which will resonate from Silicon Valley to the Beltway. "The importance of the lawsuit simply comes down to its result," Volach said, with a sigh of apparent exasperation. "If Apple loses it, it is hugely significant for generations to come. If it wins, it's business as usual."

The onus will be on Epic to make the case that Apple enjoys monopoly status in a fragmented smartphone market, said Dan Wang, an associate professor of management at Columbia University.

"It will be hard to prove with the platforms of Android and Samsung," Wang told MarketWatch.

-Jon Swartz; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

May 01, 2021 10:58 ET (14:58 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Earnings Calendar and Events Data provided by |Terms of Use| © 2021 Wall Street Horizon, Inc.

Market data accompanied by is delayed by at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE MKT, NYSE, and options. Duration of the delay for other exchanges varies.
Market data and information provided by Morningstar.

Options are not suitable for all investors as the special risks inherent to options trading may expose investors to potentially rapid and substantial losses.
Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standard Options before investing in options.

Information and news provided by ,, , Computrade Systems, Inc., , and

Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.